-
“My fervent wish is to join you and with my own hands clean the dear theater from the filth brought by delirious madness”: the pillage of the Maly theater in early November 1917Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History 2022. N 3. p.53-72read more1311
-
Between October and November 1917, Moscow became the scene of the fierce fighting between the supporters of the Bolsheviks and the forces loyal to the Provisional Government. Active hostilities took place in Theater Square, and as a result, both state theaters, the Bolshoi and Maly, were damaged. The Bolshoi Theater was relatively lucky, but the Maly was pillaged at the hands of a Red Guard detachment, which was formed at the Kolchuginsky plant in the Vladimir province. It arrived in Moscow on 1 November and occupied the theater on the night of 2 November. As soon as the Red Guards were induced to leave the Maly Theater on 4 November, the heads of the latter (artists A.I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin and O.A. Pravdin) initiated a scrupulous calculation of the losses. The damage caused to the state property was generally compensated within a few months, unlike the significant losses of the personal property of the artists and employees. Correspondence about the compensation for the latter lasted for at least a year, while progressing inflation was depreciating the originally claimed compensation. The plunder of the Maly Theater had such political consequences as a sharp surge of anti-Bolshevik sentiments not only among the members of its troupe, but in Moscow theatrical circles as a whole. The press described the “pillage” of the “Shchepkin’s Home” in minute detail, the journalists did not spare harsh words to characterize the Red Guards, and the actors of the Maly Theater themselves at a general meeting on 7 November accepted the resolution proposed by A.I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin in which they sharply demanded non-interference in their activities by any institutions or persons that did not belong to the troupe. That was an obvious attack on the Moscow Military Revolutionary Committee and its appointee “commissar for theatre” E.K. Malinovskaya. The plunder of the Maly Theater contributed to the strengthening of the positions of irreconcilable opponents of the new government in the theater department, in particular, F.D. Batyushkov, whom A.I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin gave a detailed report about the events in Moscow.
Keywords: Russian October revolution of 1917; fi ghting in Moscow in November 1917; Bolsheviks; Maly Theatre; A.I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin; O.A. Pravdin; F.D. Batyushkov
-
-
"Travel Must Be Undertaken in Comfortable Conditions": A.V. Lunacharsky and the Struggle for Nomenklatura PrivilegesMoscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History 2025. Vol.66. N 5. p.64-78read more45
-
From the mid-1920s onward, A.V. Lunacharsky — who had married the young actress N.A. Rosenel, fond of a refined lifestyle — increasingly petitioned the highest party leadership for a range of nomenklatura privileges. He insisted that a service automobile be permanently assigned to him (a vehicle often used by his wife, at times provoking scandalous incidents), and he demanded free and comfortable rail travel for himself and his spouse on the railways of the USSR. In letters marked "secret", Lunacharsky asked the secretary of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR, A.S. Enukidze, and other addressees to grant him and his second family vacations at Soviet resorts, as well as a state-owned dacha for the summer season in one of the former noble estates outside Moscow. At the same time, despite his communist convictions, Lunacharsky refused to rest at the "large workers' resorts", where, in his words, "bickering, complaints, and all manner of disorder" prevailed. Considerable correspondence also concerned foreign official travel, on which Lunacharsky was accompanied by his young wife — justified either by her serious illness and need for treatment, or by physicians' advice that he not travel alone. For trips to Western Europe, the People's Commissar of Education requested travel allowances that enabled his family to live generously in capitalist countries. Lunacharsky's persistent appeals for material assistance and for the extension of various benefits to himself, his wife, and her relatives — appeals not always granted — point to his comparatively modest standing within the Soviet political elite in the second half of the 1920s and the early 1930s. These requests, and the time-consuming correspondence they generated, further undermined the authority of the head of Soviet education in the eyes of I.V. Stalin and his circle, and may have contributed to Lunacharsky's removal from the post of People's Commissar of Education in 1929.Keywords: A.S. Enukidze, N.A. Rosenel, Narkompros, Soviet everyday life, nomenklatura privileges
-


