Abstract

The Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activities in the Russian Federation”, which was approved by the State Duma in March 1997, was rejected by the President, who was guided by purely political considerations. However, many ambiguities and gaps of the law, which was thought to regulate and govern the activities of the opposition as an independent legal entity, would have inevitably created serious problems if it had entered into force. In the 2000s, representatives of the opposition factions in the Duma tried several times unsuccessfully to revisit this issue. In this respect, the experience of the 1990s, when the draft law became federal law even if it never entered into force, seems to be the most effective and therefore of the greatest research interest. The Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activity in the Russian Federation” can be qualified primarily as a kind of historical source reflecting the political situation of the second half of the 1990s. In contemporary literature, the law is considered only in the general context of the large scale problem of providing additional legal guaran tees to the political minority in the Russian Federation. In recent years there has been a sharp decline in the number of scholarly works dealing with the theoretical issues of the legal institutionalisation of the opposition and the adoption of a special statute guaranteeing the rights of “dissenters”. This article examines the problem of the legal legitimation of the opposition, which was actualised in the second half of the 1990s by the representatives of the left -wing forces, on the basis of the complex use of different sources (legal acts and bills, parliamentary materials, data from the periodicals, electronic resources). The subject of the study is the political and legal context of the development, adoption and reasoned rejection of the Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activity in the Russian Federation”. Its study is relevant because there is almost no analysis of the development and adoption of the Russian law “On Opposition” as a special regulatory act, which additionally guaranteed the rights and special status of the alternative socio-political associations.

References

Abashin S.N. Vopreki “zdravomu smyslu”? (K voprosu o “ratsional’nosti/irratsional’nosti” ritual’nykh raskhodov v Sredney Azii) [Against “Common Sense”? (On the Question of the “Rationality/Irrationality” of Ritual Expenses in Central Asia)] // Vestnik Yevrazii. 1999. N 1–2 (6–7). P. 87–107.

Foucault M. Politicheskaya funktsiya intellektuala [Th e Political Function of the Intellectual] // Intellektualy i vlast’: izbrannyye politicheskiye stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu [Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Articles, Speeches and Interviews]. Moscow: Praksis, 2002. 384 p.

Gofman A.B. Traditsiya, solidarnost’ i sotsiologicheskaya teoriya. Izbrannyye teksty [Tradition, Solidarity and Sociological Th eory. Selected Texts]. Moscow: Novyy Khronograf, 2015. 496 p.

Greimas A.J., Fontanille J. Semiotika strastey. Ot sostoyaniya veshchey k sostoyaniyu dushi [Th e Semiotics of Passions: From States of Aff airs to States of Feelings]. Moscow: URSS; LENAND, 2015. 336 p.

Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Soft ware of the Mind. New York et al.: Mc Graw Hill, 2015. 279 p.

Juergensmeyer M. “Uzhas Moy poshlyu pred toboyu”: religioznoye nasiliye v global’nom masshtabe [“I Will Send My Horror before You”: Religious Violence on a Global Scale]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2022. 496 p. (Series “Studia religiosa”).

Kalachev B., Polyakov S. Bytovoy islam [Everyday Islam] // Molodoy kommunist.1989. N 2. P. 30–38.

Larina E.I. Sredneaziatskaya etnografiya professora S.P. Polyakova: nauka i instrumental’nost’ [Central Asian Ethnography of Professor S.P. Polyakov: Science and Instrumentality] // Vostokovedcheskiye issledovaniya na postsovetskom prostranstve: sbornik nauchnykh statey, posvyashchennyy pamyati professora S.P. Polyakova [Oriental Studies in the Post-Soviet Space: A Collection of Scientifi c Articles Dedicated to the Memory of Professor S.P. Polyakov]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 2014. P. 21–34. (Proceedings of the Faculty of History, Moscow State University. Is. 67. Series 2. Istoricheskiye issledovaniya; 28).

Larina E.I., Naumova O.B. Skvoz’ modernizatsiyu: traditsii v sovremennoy zhizni rossiyskikh kazakhov [Th rough Modernization: Traditions in the Modern Life of Russian Kazakhs]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2016. 304 p.

Malinovskiy B. Izbrannoye. Argonavty zapadnoy chasti Tikhogo okeana [Argonauts of the Western Pacifi c]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2004. 249 p.

Mironov V.V. Protsessy transformatsii kul’tury v globaliziruyushchemsya mire: kommunikatsionnyy vektor [Processes of Transformation of Culture in a Globalizing World: A Communication Vector] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7. Filosofi ya. 2010. N 3. P. 3–25.Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya [Many Globalizations] / Ed. by P. Berger and S. Huntington. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2004. 379 p.

Naumova O.B. Chastnoye prostranstvo v sisteme tsennostey traditsionnogo obshchestva [Private Space in the Value System of Traditional Society] // Etnografi cheskoye obozreniye. 2014. N 4. P. 77–93.

Polyakov S.P. Traditsionalizm v sovremennom sredneaziatskom obshchestve [Traditionalism in Modern Central Asian Society]. Moscow: [S. n.], 1989. 112 p.

Rashkoff D. Mediavirus. Kak popkul’tura tayno vozdeystvuyet na vashe soznaniye[Mediavirus. How Pop Culture Secretly Infl uences Your Consciousness]. Moscow: Ul’tra-kul’tura, 2003. 363 p.

Sahlins M. Poor Man, Rich Man, Big-Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia // Comparative Studies in Society and History. April 1963. Vol. 5. Is. 3. P. 285–303.

Zhit’ s dostoinstvom: sbornik statey [Living with Dignity: A Collection of Articles] / Ed. by O. Kharkhordin. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Yevropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2019. 144 p. (Series “RES PUBLICA”. Is. 10).

“Zhit’ v dvukh mirakh”: pereosmyslyaya transnatsionalizm i translokal’nost’: sbornik statey [“Living in Two Worlds”: Rethinking Transnationalism and Translocality: A Collection of Articles]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2021. 520 p. (Biblioteka zhurnala “Neprikosnovennyy zapas”).