ISSN 0130-0083
En Ru
ISSN 0130-0083
The problem of passing the federal law “on opposition” in the Russian Federation in the second half of the 1990s

Abstract

The Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activities in the Russian Federation”, which was approved by the State Duma in March 1997, was rejected by the President, who was guided by purely political considerations. However, many ambiguities and gaps of the law, which was thought to regulate and govern the activities of the opposition as an independent legal entity, would have inevitably created serious problems if it had entered into force. In the 2000s, representatives of the opposition factions in the Duma tried several times unsuccessfully to revisit this issue. In this respect, the experience of the 1990s, when the draft law became federal law even if it never entered into force, seems to be the most effective and therefore of the greatest research interest. The Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activity in the Russian Federation” can be qualified primarily as a kind of historical source reflecting the political situation of the second half of the 1990s. In contemporary literature, the law is considered only in the general context of the large scale problem of providing additional legal guaran tees to the political minority in the Russian Federation. In recent years there has been a sharp decline in the number of scholarly works dealing with the theoretical issues of the legal institutionalisation of the opposition and the adoption of a special statute guaranteeing the rights of “dissenters”. This article examines the problem of the legal legitimation of the opposition, which was actualised in the second half of the 1990s by the representatives of the left -wing forces, on the basis of the complex use of different sources (legal acts and bills, parliamentary materials, data from the periodicals, electronic resources). The subject of the study is the political and legal context of the development, adoption and reasoned rejection of the Federal Law “On Legal Guarantees of Opposition Activity in the Russian Federation”. Its study is relevant because there is almost no analysis of the development and adoption of the Russian law “On Opposition” as a special regulatory act, which additionally guaranteed the rights and special status of the alternative socio-political associations.

References

Alebastrova I.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy status politicheskoy oppozitsii [Constitutional and Legal Status of Political Opposition] // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. N 3. P. 138–142.

Avtonomov A. Gosudarstvennoye fi nansirovaniye politicheskikh partiy: Rossiya v kontekste mirovogo opyta [State Financing of Political Parties: Russia in the Context of World Experience] // Pravovoy status politicheskikh partiy v yevropeyskikh stranakh: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Legal Status of Political Parties in European Countries: Collection of Scientifi c Works]. Minsk: Tesey, 2003. P. 5–20.

Bobrakova N.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii i konstitutsionnom zakreplenii politicheskoy oppozitsii kak pravovogo instituta [On Defi nition and Constitutional Consolidation of Political Opposition as a Legal Institution] // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. N 1. P. 145–150.

Chertova L.N., Gorbachev M.V. O konstitutsionnom regulirovanii deyatel’nosti sistemnoy oppozitsii v sovremennoy Rossii [On the Constitutional Regulation of the System Opposition Activity in Contemporary Russia] // Nuzhna li Rossii novaya Konstitutsiya: sbornik materialov kruglogo stola [Does Russia Need a New Constitution: Collection of Round Table Materials]. Kurgan: Izdatel’stvo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014. P. 22–24.

Golovinov A.V. Osobennosti realizatsii konstitutsionnogo printsipa ideologicheskogo mnogoobraziya v zakonodatel’stve o politicheskikh partiyakh [Aspects of the Implementation of the Constitutional Principle of Ideological Diversity in the Legislation Regarding Political Parties] // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.2016. N 3. P. 43–46.

Kononov K.A. Protivnik ofi tsial’nykh idey i pozitsiy dolzhen imet’ svoye mesto na politicheskoy arene [An Opponent of Offi cial Ideas and Positions Must Be Able to Find a Place in the Political Arena] // Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. 2011. N 11. P. 9–15.

Kuz’minykh N.V. Oppozitsionnaya deyatel’nost’ v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: k voprosu o prinyatii federal’nogo zakona [Oppositional Activity in the Russian Federation: On Adoption of the Federal Law] // Sovremennoye pravo. 2007. N 6. P. 37–46.

Levenkov P.V. Mnogopartiynost’ ili mnozhestvennost’ partiy [Multiparty System or Plurality of Parties] // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2009. N 3. P. 192–197.

Lotts D.N. K voprosu o pravovom regulirovanii oppozitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v sovremennykh gosudarstvakh [On Legal Regulation of Oppositional Activity in Contemporary States] // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2009. N 6. P. 222–227.

Mamonov V.V. Konstitutsionnyye voprosy stanovleniya politicheskoy oppozitsii v sovremennoy Rossii [Constitutional Issues of Formation of Political Opposition in Modern Russia] // Konstitutsionnoye razvitiye Rossii: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh statey [Constitutional Development of Russia: Interuniversity Collection of Scientifi c Articles] / Ed. by V.T. Kabyshev. Is. 13. Saratov: Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya juridicheskaya akademiya, 2013. P. 29–36.

Nudnenko L.A. Pravovyye garantii parlamentskoy oppozitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v Gosudarstvennoy Dume Federal’nogo Sobraniya RF [Legal Guarantees of Parliamentary Opposition Activity in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation] // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. N 8. P. 12–19.

Sorokin M.Yu. Prava fraktsiy oppozitsii i men’shinstva v Natsional’nom Sobranii Frantsii [Rights of Opposition and Minority Factions in the National Assembly of France] // LEX RUSSICA (Nauchnyye trudy MGYUA). 2010. N 5. P. 1176–1179.

Troitskaya A.A. Parlamentskaya oppozitsiya v sisteme razdeleniya vlastey: organizatsionnyye garantii i dostupnyye instrumenty kontrolya [Parliamentary Opposition in System of Power Division: Organizational Guarantees and Available Tools of Control] // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2011. N 11. P. 67–81.

Vasil’eva S.V. Individual’nyy issledovatel’skiy proyekt N 09-01-0009 “Konstitutsionno-pravovoy status politicheskoy oppozitsii” (vypolnen pri podderzhke Programmy “Nauchnyy fond GU-VSHE” [Individual Research Project N 09-01-0009 “The Constitutional and Legal Status of Political Opposition” (completed with the support of the Program “Scientifi c Fund of the State University – Higher School of Economics”]. — URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/05/12/1217381805/%D0%9A%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0%20%D0%9E%D0%BF%D0%BF%D0... 

Zeynalbdyyeva A.V. Politicheskaya oppozitsiya kak kollektivnaya forma realizatsii prava na protest v Rossii [Political Opposition as a Collective Form of Realization of the Right to Protest in Russia] // Nauka i obrazovaniye: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravleniye. 2017. N 2. P. 81–84

PDF, ru

Received: 10/11/2021

Accepted: 01/15/2022

Accepted date: 02/28/2022

Keywords: federal law, opposition, State Duma, President of the Russian Federation, political parties, V.I. Zorkal’tsev

Available in the on-line version with: 28.02.2022

To cite this article:
Issue 1, 2022