Abstract

From the late 15th century until Peter the Great’s tax reform, there were kabala bondmen (kholopy), who had lost their freedom by debt and service bondages (kabalas), along with the “full” bondmen that existed from ancient times. The latter were inherited, while the former had to be set free aft er the death of their owner, having formalized a manumission record in the Kholopiy prikaz. The 1649 Sobornoe Ulozhenie clearly distinguished between these two categories of bondmen. From the beginning of the Great Northern War, Peter I ordered to enroll in the army house serfs (dvorovye) fit for military service and set free aft er the death of their owners. Lord’s men could also enroll in military service at will. After the extension of the per capita tax to the “boyar men” it was forbidden to enroll them in service, and the manumission of house serfs with manumission letters was resumed. Unlike legislative norms, the practical side of this widespread social phenomenon has not been adequately studied. The manumission records of house serfs in 1717–1780, preserved in the fonds of the Office of Justice in the Russian State Archive of Ancient Documents, as well as their petitions and the minutes of the Office of Justice allow us to elucidate the circumstances and procedure of manumission of house serfs, collisions that arose in this process, as well as the prospects of their further life. Manumission letters written at home were signed and sealed with the owner’s personal seal and certified by witnesses. In this case, they had to be registered in the serfdom institutions and then submitted to a Hofgericht (nadvorny court) or provincial chancellery to decide on the fate of the manumitted serf. Peter the Great’s tax reform contributed to the erasure of the distinction between old and kabala bondmen. The term kholop (bondman) was soon replaced by the term dvorovyi (house serf), and any house serf could be manumitted. Most of those manumitted again voluntarily signed up “forever” to the old or new master. The Manifesto of 17 March 1775 oriented the manumitted serfs to enter the petty bourgeoisie or merchant state and reflected the actual need to get rid of archaic forms of personal dependence.

References

Anisimov E.V. Podatnaya reforma Petra I. Vvedeniye podushnoy podati v Rossii 1719–1728 gg. [Peter I’s Tax Reform. Th e Introduction of Per Capita Tax in Russia in 1719–1728]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1982. 296 p.

Dvoryane Moskvy: svadebnyye akty i dukhovnyye zaveshchaniya petrovskogo vremeni [Moscow Nobles: Wedding Acts and Last Wills under Peter the Great] / Comp. and comm. by N.V. Kozlova and A.Yu. Prokof ’yeva. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2015. 911 p.

Kamenskiy A.B. Ot Petra I do Pavla I: reformy v Rossii XVI II veka (opyt tselostnogo analiza) [From Peter I to Paul I: Reforms in Russia in the 18th Century (An Attempt at Holistic Analysis)]. Moscow: RGGU, 1999. 575 p.

Klyuchevskiy V.O. Proiskhozhdeniye krepostnogo prava v Rossii [Origin of Serfdom in Russia] // Klyuchevskiy V.O. Sochineniya [Works]. In 9 vols. Vol. VIII. Articles / Ed. by V.L. Yanin. Moscow: Mysl’, 1990. P. 120–193.

Kosheleva O.E. “Otkhodya ot sveta sego…”. Chastnaya zhizn’ moskovskoy elity XVII veka cherez prizmu zaveshchaniy [“Departing from Th is World…”. Private Life of the Moscow Elite in the 17th Century according to Wills] // Chelovek v mire chuvstv. Ocherki po istorii chastnoy zhizni v Yevrope i nekotorykh stranakh Azii do nachala novogo vremeni [Man in the World of Feelings. Essays on the History of Private Life in Europe and Some Asian Countries before the Beginning of the Modern Time] / Ed. by Yu.L. Bessmertny. Moscow: RGGU, 2000. P. 339–386.

Kozlova N.V. “Chelovek yevo, kotoryy za dely khodit…”: “lyudi boyarskiye” v domakh moskovskikh dvoryan petrovskogo vremeni [“His Man Who Goes for Service…”: “Boyar People” in the Houses of Moscow Nobles of the Petrine Time] // Kozlova N.V. Russkiy gorod XVIII veka. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Russian Town of the 18th Century. Studies of Diff erent Years]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia, 2023. P. 132–142.

Kozlova N.V. “I vsyakaya sluzhnya rabota rabotat’…”: “posluzhivtsy” v domakh zhiteley Moskvy pervoy chetverti XVIII v. [“And to Work Any Service Work…”: “Posluzhivtsy” in the Households of Moscow Residents in the First Quarter of the 18^th Century] // Kozlova N.V. Russkiy gorod XVIII veka. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Russian Town of the 18th Century. Studies of Diff erent Years]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia, 2023. P. 143–156.

Paneyakh V.M. Ukazy o kholop’ikh otpusknykh 50-kh godov XVI v. [Edicts on Manumission of Bondmen in the 1550s] // Iz istorii feodal’noy Rossii. Stat’i i ocherki (k 70-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya prof. V.V. Mavrodina) [From the History of Feudal Russia. Articles and Essays (On the 70th Anniversary of Professor V.V. Mavrodin)]. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1978. P. 103–110.

Tikhonov Ya.A. Mir veshchey v moskovskikh i peterburgskikh domakh sanovnogo dvoryanstva (po novym istochnikam pervoy poloviny XVIII v.) [The World of Things in Moscow and Petersburg Houses of the Nobility (According the New Sources of the First Half of the 18th Century)]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2008. 352 p.