Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the activities of professional academic associations in the U.S., which are close to the memory institutions in Europe. The author examines the role of professional associations as memory institutions in the development of memorial culture through the representation of the past in contemporary politics, its reflection in public and public spaces of American society. The novelty of the study lies in the comparison of institutions that determine the main vectors and trajectories of historical policy as memory policy in the United States. The article analyses the problems of the activities of institutionalized actors of collective memory policy in the U.S., including the American Historical Association, the Organization of American Historians and the Southern Historical Association. It hypothesizes that these groups can shape civil society versions of collective memory as alternatives to politically motivated use of the past by political elites. The article deals with the institutional and formal features of historical politics in the United States, the participation of historical associations in memorial confl icts and “memory wars”, issues of politicization of history and the academic community’s attempts at forming a canon of historical collective memory which is formally free from ideological infl uences. The activities of professional historical associations have supposedly been a factor in the development of revisionism in the interpretation of the history of the American South and the Confederate States of America. Therefore, the author considers the role and responsibility of American historians as public intellectuals who shaped compromise versions of memorial culture that contributed to the consolidation of society. The article highlights the contribution of professional historical associations as memory institutions to the development of mnemonic spaces of American society and its memorial culture. It analyses the attempts of American historians to preserve the “purity” of academic research in the context of the growing ideologization and instrumentalization of history by ruling elites. The research results suggest that memory institutions are an important factor in the development of contemporary identities in the United States in the context of revision of the past and the formation of new or alternative memorial canons in American political culture.

References

Astrov A. Estoniya: politicheskaya bor’ba za mesto v istorii [Estonia: Political Struggle for a Place in History] // Pro et contra. 2009. May–August. P. 109–124.

Blight D.W. Historians and “Memory” // Commonplace. The Journal of Early American Life. 2002. Vol. 2. N 3. — URL: http://commonplace.online/article/historians-and-memory/

Byrne A. Institutional Memory and Memory Institutions // Th e Australian Library Journal. 2015. Vol. 64. N 4. P. 259–269.

Cadava G.L. How Should Historians Remember the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act? — URL: https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2015/august/how-should-historians-remember-the-1965-immigration-and-n...

Callahan S., Ledgerwood A. On the Psychological Function of Flags and Logos: Group Identity Symbols Increase Perceived Entitativity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2016. Vol. 110. N 4. P. 528–550.

Cohen A.J. War Monuments, Public Patriotism, and Bereavement in Russia, 1905–2015. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2020. 271 p.

Cook R.J. Civil War Memories: Contesting the Past in the United States since 1865. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. 288 р.

Corbett J. Institutional Memory: We Need a More Dynamic Understanding of the Way Institutions Remember // London School of Economics. 2018. February 22. — URL: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/institutional-memory-dynamic-approach/

Danilova N. Th e Politi cs of War Commemoration in the UK and Russia. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 272 p.

Dempsey L. Memory Institutions Redux: Pluralizing Memories and a Stay against Forgetting // Lorcan Dempsey. 2018. December 7. — URL: https://www.lorcandempsey.net/memory-institutions-redux/

Kamman M. Mystic Chords of Memory: Th e Transformation of Tradition in American Culture. New York: Vintage Press, 1993. 880 p.

Kolesnyk I. Ukrayins’kyy istoryk i vlada: vid prymusu do partnerstva [Ukrainian Historian and Power: From Coercion to Partnership] // Eidos. Al’manakh teoriyi ta istoriyi istorychnoyi nauky. 2017. Issue 9. P. 9–24.

Koposov N. Istoricheskiye ponyatiya v mire bez budushchego [Historical Concepts in a World without a Future] // Kak my pishem istoriyu [How We Write History] / Ed. by G. Garreta, G. Dufaud, L. Pimenovа. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2013. P. 57–93.

Landsberg A. Prosthetic Memory: Th e Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004. 240 р.

Lee E. Th e Necessity of Teaching Asian American History. — URL: https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2022/asian-american-and-pacifi c-islander-history/the-necessityof-teaching-asian-american-history/

Lindner R. New Directions in Belarusian Studies Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus // Nationalities Papers. 1999. Vol. 27. N 4. P. 631–647.

Linn-Tynen E. Reclaiming the Past as a Matter of Social Justice: African American Heritage, Representation and Identity in the United States // Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage: Construction, Transformation and Destruction / Ed. by V. Apaydin. London: UCL Press, 2020. P. 255–268.

Makarov A.I. Istoricheskaya pamyat’: konstruktsiya ili rekonstruktsiya? [Historical Memory: Construction or Reconstruction?] // Istoricheskaya ekspertiza. 2014. N 1. P. 4–10

Memory Cultures: Memory, Subjectivity and Recognition / Ed. by S. Leydesdorff . London; New York: Routledge, 2017. 240 p

Miller A. Rossiya: vlast’ I istoriya [Russia: Power and History] // Pro et Contra. 2009. May-August. P. 6-4.

Ocasio W., Mauskapf M., Steele Ch. History, society, and institutions: the role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics // Academy of Management Review. 2016. Vol. 41. N 4. Р. 676–699.

Outhwaite W., Ray L. Madernasc, pamiac I postkamunizm [Modernity, Memory and Post-Communism] // Palitycnaja sfera. 2006. N 6. P.27-43.

Radstone S. Memory, History, Nation: Contested Pasts. London; New York: Routledge, 2017. 282 p.

Scott S. Th e Battle for Historical Memory // Harvard Political Review. 2021. July 21. — URL: https://harvardpolitics.com/battle-for-historical-memory/

Ugarte M. In Praise of Forgetting and the Historical Memory of the Spanish Civil War // Historiografías. 2017. No 13. P. 146–155.